The Global Warming Zone, Part 14: Yes, this was an overreacton all along and we should open up

Dr. Briggs has the numbers today. Actually, some of the links he gives I’m not impressed with – like the urgent care doctor’s video where they make estimates on death rates – but it’s becoming more and more undeniable that death rates are being spiked.

“But look at the overall death rates of the whole world and see how they’ve jumped!”

Mmmmmmm, yeah. When people are huddling in their homes terrified to go to the doctor, or else getting turned down for silly little non-essential things like biopsies, you get that.

(Not to mention, we’re back in “Emperor’s New Clothes” territory. Last article I saw was that cases were 60% higher than we thought. Does this sound even remotely, slightly plausible? To anyone? No?)

And worldwide, we’re going to end up, probably, with somewhere in the range of swine flu numbers.

“Swine flu did it over a year, this is three months! That makes a difference!”

It does make a difference, for one reason and one reason only: If it would overwhelm the hospitals.

But the hospitals aren’t CLOSE to being overwhelmed.

“But the only reason they aren’t is the lockdowns!”

This is why it’s called the global warming zone. We’re not hitting Fauci’s low numbers even WITH what is looking more and more like juiced numbers, and oh yeah, that was with perfect compliance, which as the media loves harping on is manifestly NOT happening.

Again – it’s not that our medical system is stretched thin, and we juuuuuuuuuuuust made it. It isn’t stretched at all. It’s contracting; doctors are being fired. So the time element is really not relevant.

Everybody is still, still trying to talk about how the reason it’s like this is because of all of the lockdowns and social distancing. Why do we think this? Because the epidemiologists say so.

The same epidemiologists who haven’t even been close to right.

“But cases are jumping where people are less strict!”


Let them jump. We’ve already looked at the historical perspective. They can jump quite a bit and historically still not be that bad.

The goal here is not “Less deaths than swine flu” or “As few deaths as possible”. The goal is “Not a worldwide disaster.” The reason I keep harping on the 1967 flu is that not only will it end up being worse, even the CDC doesn’t treat it like a big deal. There aren’t even any articles comparing that flu to this pandemic, which is actually kind of bizarre when you think about it.

We were never close to disaster from the kung flu. Sarah Hoyt thinks we pretty much have already caused one from the lockdown.

I disagree; it looks pretty likely things will start opening up sometime in May, in which case, we’ll probably do fine long term. And Trump will win easily anyway. As for people putting in lockdown restrictions again in September, well. we’ll see. That’s months away.

Look, I never thought we should do nothing about all of this. I was in total agreement with the initial one month lockdown. That was meant to monitor the situation and be clear on what was happening.

When it was over, what was happening was obvious: There was an epidemic in the metro area and a couple other cities and the rest of the country had a cold. So, Trump was discussing a county by county system, which was precisely the right plan…then Fauci came out with his insane models that said we were quadrupling the worldwide death totals in a month, with perfect compliance (which we didn’t get).

Once again, it was an Emperor’s new clothes scenario: The model was clearly ridiculous, the disease equivalent of “The glaciers will melt by 2020”. The correct thing to do was take that model, look at it in context with the rest of the data we had, and then use that county by county system. But Trump panicked and double downed for a month, and here we are.

There is another dirty secret here – This pandemic? It’s EXTREMELY localized. Like, extremely. It hits big in, say, the metro area – NYC ALONE has over 50% of the country’s cases, now add in Bergen County and the counties south – and practically not at all anywhere else. I’m an hour and a half from Bergen County, maybe 2 or a little less from the city, and my county STILL DOESN’T HAVE AN EPIDEMIC. There are counties even closer with no epidemic. It’s Lombardy all over again – we’re extrapolating from obviously specific circumstances and ruining people’s lives as a result.

And, as always, the final prediction: When the weather breaks, cases will drop like a rock, and we get to witness the delightful spectacle of government officials scrambling to take credit for it.

As always, wash your hands.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Global Warming Zone, Part 14: Yes, this was an overreacton all along and we should open up

  1. Chad says:

    Another data point that I think we’ll see in the future is ascribing all increases in deaths to covid. I’ve been listening to Chris Martinson at work just to hear some of the reports and stats – I don’t agree with his take on them but he brings up almost all the big headlines I don’t have time to read.

    Just today, he started using juiced up stats that will take into covid deaths all the deaths from suicide, delayed procedures, etc.

    Really eye opening on what the next global warming step will be, that someone that has been trying to pound on stats and models is now openly using bad stats and admitting it.

    Also, as a side note, I am starting to just laugh at the germophobes modeling how far germs can spread. As if they suddenly are more deadly than ever before and using ridiculous models to inspire fear of someone coughing all the way across a Walmart store. This stuff is entering crazytown usa

  2. Rudolph Harrier says:

    As expected the stay at home order for Minnesota was extended another two weeks. The governor’s press conference on the matter was revealing in many ways:

    -He treated only opening up on May 18th as something far restrictive than average. And the sad thing is that he’s probably right.

    -He stressed over and over again that more people should be wearing masks. But at one point he stated that there isn’t much conclusive evidence that masks do too much to protect your or others from infection. Instead he said that they were essential as a symbol that we were all committed to the cause. This is a civic ritual, not a scientific reaction.

    -He softened things by announcing that some restrictions would be lessened, such as allowing most stores to do curbside service. He said that the state was not trying to interfere with business and that this was all done for the benefit of businesses, since people would not want to go to unsafe places anyway. He repeatedly implied that following the guidelines would be voluntary. But then he stressed that violations could result in major fines.

    -He also said that they may relax social gathering restrictions, such as allowing gatherings of no more than ten people if they are all from the same extended family. Here’s the thing: people have been doing that, and far beyond that, for weeks anyway. And as dumb as our government is they haven’t even attempted to crack down on such gatherings, since they’d have to fine half the state. But the governor gave the illusion that he has complete control over the personal lives of every citizen.

    This is all theater to remind us that we should be loyal to our betters. It won’t be long until the “science” isn’t even a pretext.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s