The Animation Ghetto is there for a reason

The common refrain from the conservative end of the spectrum, or at least what seems to be a general attitude from what I’ve seen in a couple of posts and their comments sections (mine included!), is that animation and children’s movies in general are not given the credit they are due by the Hollywood elite.

Here’s the thing though: Most of the time, they shouldn’t be.

I’ll go back to an old argument/debate, “Silence of the Lambs” vs. “Beauty and the Beast”. Let me start by saying that I love “Beauty and the Beast”. The music is spectacularly good, and the story is entertaining. But it is clearly not as good of a film as SotL.

The main reason Mr. Wright, at the time of the original argument, gave for favoring BatB over SotL (bear with me, this is going to be relevant to my main point) is that BatB was about a monster who is saved by the power of true love while SotL was about an utterly nihilistic, cannibalistic monster.

But there’s a problem. That’s not actually any sort of point, except to say that you prefer particular themes in your movies. Perhaps we should prefer that sort of theme, but it doesn’t in itself make the movie good. And BatB is marred by plot holes, big ones no less, and the plot centers around, let’s face it, a classic case of pure Stockholm Syndrome. I mean, really textbook. I don’t think you need to stretch for that one.

To those who are compelled to jump in and say that I’m missing the point of the story by focusing on that – you’re right! Because it’s a children’s movie, and in a children’s movie you can gloss over sloppy plotting as long as your animation is good, your music is beautiful (which it really, really is, to be fair), and your story progresses in a logical way and comes to a satisfying conclusion. BatB does this, and with a lot of heart and lovable characters to boot. But the plot holes remain.

It’s like the cartoon “Gravity Falls” – the last episode was fantastic, and it all revolved some absolutely massive plot holes. But who cares? It was really entertaining, and when a show is designed for children that’s more important than smart plotting.

BatB is a fairy tale. In a fairy tale it’s important that you stick to your general theme, tell your story in an entertaining way, and end it with some moral. And BatB is an EXCELLENT fairy tale, full of wit, heart, and beauty, but an excellent fairy tale is never going to be on the level of, say, “The Lord of the Rings”. Or “SotL”, which is tightly plotted and brilliantly acted.

And this is why Pixar deserves the credit they get. They are the only studio out there – the only one – that manages to consistently, repeatedly, break out of the animation ghetto. In “The Incredibles” they go a step further, and make a movie that transcends not only the animation ghetto but also the superhero genre. “The Incredibles” is an  incredible (heh) film, because it creates a human story with brilliant characters and clever themes, AND it does it in a traditional superhero movie with fight scenes and villains and superpowers, AND it does all of this in a cartoon! It was a children’s movie about marriage. If that’s not adult, what is?

“Dreamworks”, in my opinion, has never broken out of the animation ghetto. “How to Train Your Dragon”, widely considered Dreamworks’ best movie (along with the first two “Shrek”‘s, which are funny but not much else), is a decent film, but it is clearly a kids’ movie; what I mean is, it’s a movie designed basically to appeal to kids, which it succeeds at, but the writing is not strong enough, the story, dialogue, and characterization simply not good enough, for to be judged on par with Pixar’s best.

Compare it to “Toy Story”. The original was about accepting your place in the grand scale of creation. The sequel was about what sacrifices you’d be willing to make in exchange for immortality. The third was about accepting the inevitability of death!

And then we have “How to Train Your Dragon”, a nice but not overly special bildungsroman, or “Beauty and the Beast”, a good romance if you can look past the plot holes.

So it’s only natural that animation has always been looked down upon: It’s always been worse. Pixar’s been changing that, though, for twenty years now, and it’s time Hollywood finally got with the program.

(By the way, Disney’s actual best movie is “The Lion King”. Why? Well, not only did it have great music, but it took its plot from “Hamlet”. Anything that copies the Bard and doesn’t mess it up entirely is always going to be smarter than the average bear.)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Animation Ghetto is there for a reason

  1. BatB is a fairy tale. In a fairy tale it’s important that you stick to your general theme, tell your story in an entertaining way, and end it with some moral. And BatB is an EXCELLENT fairy tale, full of wit, heart, and beauty, but an excellent fairy tale is never going to be on the level of, say, “The Lord of the Rings”. Or “SotL”, which is tightly plotted and brilliantly acted.

    So what if LotR was animated? (indeed with some of the CGI they had to use, some might argue it is)

    “Dreamworks”, in my opinion, has never broken out of the animation ghetto. “How to Train Your Dragon”, widely considered Dreamworks’ best movie (along with the first two “Shrek”‘s, which are funny but not much else), is a decent film, but it is clearly a kids’ movie; what I mean is, it’s a movie designed basically to appeal to kids, which it succeeds at, but the writing is not strong enough, the story, dialogue, and characterization simply not good enough, for to be judged on par with Pixar’s best.

    You bite your tongue sir! Well… maybe the first one a bit (though it was still better than Brave) but the 2nd one was absolutely about adult themes like legacies and sacrifice and the eternal burning of love. It actually improved.

    (By the way, Disney’s actual best movie is “The Lion King”. Why? Well, not only did it have great music, but it took its plot from “Hamlet”. Anything that copies the Bard and doesn’t mess it up entirely is always going to be smarter than the average bear.)

    Ugh, not every story of usurping uncles is “hamlet” any more than every story of forbidden love is Romeo & Juliet (otherwise Little Mermaid is even better since it took its plot from Romeo & Juliet and was better overall). tLK was incredibly dumb & basic, as much if not more than previous films. Enchanted was far more brilliant in both it’s spoof and tribute of those films as well as the examination of their themes.

    • So what if LotR was animated? (indeed with some of the CGI they had to use, some might argue it is)

      Then, were it a good version, it would most likely be enough to break it out of the animation ghetto. I did explicitly leave room for exceptions.

      Well… maybe the first one a bit (though it was still better than Brave) but the 2nd one was absolutely about adult themes like legacies and sacrifice and the eternal burning of love. It actually improved.

      Fair enough. Never seen the second one. I did see “Brave” though, and it was lame.

      Ugh, not every story of usurping uncles is “hamlet”

      Re-read that comment. I didn’t say it was.

      …any more than every story of forbidden love is Romeo & Juliet (otherwise Little Mermaid is even better since it took its plot from Romeo & Juliet and was better overall).

      But the problem with “The Little Mermaid” is the same problem as virtually every modern Shakespeare adaptation, from “West Side Story” to the (not half bad, but not great) “Lion King” sequel: It completely, entirely misses the point of the play. Case in point: Ariel and the Prince survive. Also, while it has good music, “Lion King”‘s is better. 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s