Ugh, J.K. Rowling

Just read the link. She is, as Wright would say, a moral retard.

I use the phrase ‘morally retarded’ extensively here, so allow me to explain what is meant. We speak of a man being ‘mentally retarded’ when he is unable to perform commonplace or elementary mental functions as heeding, comprehending, processing, deducing, judging and expressing himself on matter requiring abstract or concrete mental skills. It is different from being illiterate in that the ability is to perform the skill is missing, not just practice in the skill.

Likewise, here, MORALLY retarded is when a man is unable to perform elementary moral functions, as comprehending or processing, deducing or judging any matter requiring abstract moral judgment or concrete moral conscience. It is different from being an innocent savage because the ability to make elementary moral judgments is absent.

Rowling is apparently unable to see that when she condemns things like this now, of all times, she is giving an evil religion a pass in order to be PC.

Christians DO hold all Christians responsible for the actions of badthink Christians. Why do you think they go out of their way to condemn people like Murdoch? Because they want to make it clear that Christians don’t represent Murdoch. She condemned him. Now the average Muslim in the street must go out of their way to condemn Jihad…which would make them bad Muslims.

(By the way, look at the dishonesty of comparing fundamentalist Christians to fundamentalist Muslims, as if they’re anywhere near equivalent).

J.K. Rowling is the reason I am a writer. This really saddens me.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Ugh, J.K. Rowling

  1. Chad says:

    Ugh. Such… emptiness of morality.

    I’m facing the same thing on facebook, and calling it done for the night soon. Someone I know is relating a string of what might, at worse case, be non-violent but loud and showy ways to induce fear and warn Muslims.

    http://www.vox.com/2015/1/10/7524731/french-muslims-attacks-charlie-hebdo

    At best it is an anti “Islamophobia” institutions propaganda of “reported” crime, currently unacted upon, unconfirmed, and unreported, of a “violent” backlash against Muslims.

    I put violent in scare quotes because no one was killed, no one shot, and only one person assaulted and I am unconvinced if it is related or not. Or if any of it is, the mosques could be in a bad part of town, false reports, or even muslims scaring moderates of both sides to either action or inaction.

    But, to compare vandalism in response to an act of war to an act of war in response to a cartoon is morally retarded, as Mr Wright would say

  2. zodak says:

    “Why do you think they go out of their way to condemn people like Murdoch? Because they want to make it clear that Christians don’t represent Murdoch. She condemned him.”

    damn that’s a good point! i didn’t even notice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s